Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands
by OpenStories
"Recent Discussions on the Abolition of Patents for Inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands" by Sir William Armstrong is a scientific publication written in the late 19th century. This work presents arguments and evidence advocating for the abolition of patent laws, discussing their implications on industry and commerce in various countries. The book aims to challenge the existing patent system, suggesting that it hampers innovation and benefits a select few at the expense of public welfare. At the start of the work, Armstrong introduces the topic by outlining the severe criticisms that have emerged regarding patent laws. He presents a petition from the Newcastle Chamber of Commerce advocating for the abolition of patents, and he highlights statements from various industrial leaders and economists who assert that patents create monopolies detrimental to trade and invention. The opening portion also includes a communication from Professor Thorold Rogers, which underscores the argument that although inventors deserve recognition and compensation, the current patent system unfairly benefits a minority while stifling competition and innovation among the broader public.
Recent discussions on the abolition of patents for inventions in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, from the public domain. Republished by OpenStories from Project Gutenberg eBook #72096.
- 102,925words
- 20chapters
- 0stars
- 0bookmarks
- 0hits
20 Chapters
- 1.Front Matter (1)8,493 words
- 2.Front Matter (2)8,149 words
- 3.Front Matter (3)8,393 words
- 4.Front Matter (4)7,532 words
- 5.Front Matter (5)8,862 words
- 6.Front Matter (6)5,252 words
- 7.Chapter M: MICHEL CHEVALIER, Senator, proposed to consider Patents in their7,778 words
- 8.Chapter M: VAN ZINNICQ BERGMANN was not sufficiently prepared for the discussion612 words
- 9.Chapter M: HEEMSKERK AZN remarks that continued allusions are being made to1,175 words
- 10.Chapter M: DE BRUYN KOPS would not enter into all particulars, the matter having486 words
- 11.Chapter M: VAN HOUTEN observes, that M. Heemskerk has given the epithets of800 words
- 12.Chapter M: GODEFROI said:8 I rise to make some observations on three points3,045 words
- 13.Chapter M: VAN VOORTHUYSEN will not enter into many details, the subject having355 words
- 14.Chapter M: FOCK (Secretary of State for Home Affairs) will not have much to say,294 words
- 15.Chapter M: HEEMSKERK AZN replies. He tenders thanks for the urbanity observed1,117 words
- 16.Chapter M: HEEMSKERK AZN replies to M. Godefroi, and does not see why he should (1)8,805 words
- 17.Chapter M: HEEMSKERK AZN replies to M. Godefroi, and does not see why he should (2)8,799 words
- 18.Chapter M: HEEMSKERK AZN replies to M. Godefroi, and does not see why he should (3)8,709 words
- 19.Chapter M: HEEMSKERK AZN replies to M. Godefroi, and does not see why he should (4)6,654 words
- 20.Chapter C: H. Purday7,615 words