Skip to content

Chapter XIV: Christian Names and Surnames

Text size

The best method of treatment as regards the Christian names borne by the people during this period is to give a list of the more common names. Now there is a list ready to hand giving the names—Christian and surname—of Cade’s Kentish followers. The whole number of men on the list amounts to 1719. I have gone through the list and transcribed the Christian names. The following is the result, classified according to frequency. The names present themselves to us rather unexpectedly. Thus, we have them as follows:—

John 546
William 277
Thomas 233
Richard 196
Robert 115
Henry 53
Nicolas and }
Stephen } each 37
Roger 33
Simon 22
Laurence 21
Peter and }
Walter } each 17
James 15
Ralph 12
Hugh 8
Adam 7
Philip 6
Alan }
Elias }
Dionysius } each 5
George }
Galfrid }
Hamo }

Guy }
Bernard } each 3
Bartholomew }
Michael }

Andrew }
Benedict }
Augustine } each 2
Salmon }
Herman }

Alexander }
Alexius }
Christopher }
David }
Gerard }
Marcus }
Lodowik }
Vincentius } each 1
Valentine }
Goodman }
Gilbert }
Daniel }
Waldus }
Clement }
Sampson }

It will be seen that there are only forty-eight names in all. One-third of the men are named John, one-sixth William, one-seventh Thomas, one-eighth Richard, one-fifteenth Robert, one-thirtieth Henry; and that more than thirty out of the forty-eight names are used less than six times each. Two-thirds of the people are called either John, William, Thomas, Richard, or Robert. And all the Saxon names except one are clean gone and forgotten. Not one Alfred, Edward, Ethelred among them all.

Here, again, is another list containing the names of 130 men. They come out in the following order:—

John 34
William 17
Thomas 15
Richard 10
Robert 8
Henry 8
Roger 5
Adam 5
Stephen 3
Geoffrey 3
Nicholas 4
Walter 3
Alexander 2
Simon 2

And once:—Laurence, James, Peter, Godfrey, Alan, Giles, Gilbert, Andrew, Raynard.

Here, too, Saxon names have gone quite out of use. Among the names of women we find Johanna or Joan very common. Also frequently met with are the names of Isabel, Matilda, Alison, Lucy, Petronilla (Parnel), Agnes, Idonia, Avica, Elecota, Richolda, Ecota, Claricia, Arabella, Theophania (Tiffany), Massanda, Desiderata, Fynea, Massilia, Auncelia, Godiyeva.

As regards the women’s names, I have taken them from the _Calendar of Wills_ and arranged them in alphabetical order. It will be observed that though Saxon Christian names have entirely died out among men, many are preserved among women. It will also be observed that many beautiful names have been lost to us, though they might very well be revived. In spelling there are varieties, of which a few are here marked:—

{ Adrey
{ Awdrey

{ Agata
{ Agatha
Agnes
Alana
Albreda
Albrica
Alditha
Aleisia
Alianora
Alice
Alielma
Allesia
Alusia
Alveva
Amabillia
{ Amia
{ Amy

{ Amisia
{ Amicia
Anabilla
Anebla
Anastasia
Anna
Anneys
{ Anselina
{ Auncelina
Argentilla
Athelene
Auncilla
Auncillia
Aundryna
Avelina
Avice

Barbara
Basilia
{ Beatrice
{ Beatrix
Bersabe
Blanche
Bona
Boneioya
Bridgett

Cassandra
Castania
{ Cecilley
{ Cecilia
Charity
Chera
Cisceley
Clarice
Claricia
Clemence
{ Collecta
{ Collet
{ Coletta
Constance
Creyna
Cristina
Custance

Denys
{ Deonisia
{ Dionisia
Diamanda
Dorkes
Dulce

Earilda
{ Edith
{ Edyth
Egidia
Edelena
Eleanora
Elena
Elicia
Elizabeth
{ Em
{ Emma
Emota
Ermina
Erneburga
Essabella
Estrilda
Etheldreda
Eustachia
Eve

Felicia
Filiat
Florence
Floria
Floricia
Frechesaunchia
Fridiswida
Frances

Gena
Gencelina
Gennora
Goda
Godeleva
Gonilda
Grace
Grecia
Gunnilda
Gunnora

Hanna
{ Hawisia
{ Hawysa

{ Helen
{ Helyn
Heliwysa
Hester
Hilda
Hodierna

Ibbota
Ida
Idania
Idonea
Imania
Isabella
{ Isolda
{ Isoude
Izan

Jacobina
Jacomine
Jane
Jenet
{ Joane
{ Johan

{ Johanetta
{ Johanna
Joyce
{ Jouette
{ Juetta
Juliana
Julyan
Judith

Kastanya
Katherine

Laurencia
{ Lecia
{ Liecia
{ Letia
Leticia
Lenota
Lora
Loreta
Lucebetta
Luceky
Lucy
Luma
Lydia

Mabel
Magota
Margery
Margaret
{ Marion
{ Mariona

{ Marsilia
{ Massilia
Martha
Mary
Massia
Massilia
Matilda
{ Maudelyn
{ Mawdlyne
Mawde
Mazerb
Melina
Milicent
Milsenda
Muriel

Olive
Orabilia
Osey

Pavya
{ Pernella
{ Petronilla
Philippa

{ Rayna
{ Reyna
Rebecca
Richolda
Roberga
{ Roesia
{ Roisia
{ Roysia

{ Rosa
{ Rose
Rosamund

{ Sabina
{ Sabine
Sallerna
Sandrissa
Sarah
Scolastica
Senicla
Secilia
Sibil
Sita
Suzanna
Susan
Swanilda

Thomasina
Thomasyn
{ Thypphanya
{ Tyffania
{ Theophania

Willelma
Wynmarka
Wyleholta

I have also drawn up a list of surnames belonging to London citizens in the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries. Such a list very properly belongs to the history of London. It may be analysed by any who desire to investigate the origins of names. For the purpose of this work, I have found it to be sufficient to take the analysis made by Riley for his _Memorials of London and London Life_. It is in substance as follows:—

1. The surname of the native country, William Waleys—“the Welshman”; Walter Noreys—“the Norwegian”; John Frauncis—“the Frenchman.”

2. The surname of the native town—Riley found nearly every town and village of England represented in the London names.

3. The surname taken from the position of the man’s residence, as Hugh de Stone Crouche—Hugh near the Stone Cross of Cheapside; John atte Strond—in the Strand; Ralph de Honeylane.

4. From the sign of a house. Hence the class of names such as Gander, Buck, Hind, etc.

5. From the trade of the man or that of his father or his ancestor. All such names as Brewer, Baker, Smith, etc., belong to this class. The name of Chaucer (shoemaker) came to the poet from his grandfather presumably, as his father was not a shoemaker.

6. From a nickname, descriptive or sobriquet. Among these Riley enumerates Bon Valet, Godgrom (good groom), Cache marke (Hide halfpenny), Piggesfleshe, Brokedishei, Black in the Mouth, Weathercock, Spillwyne, Gollylolly.

The learned editor of the _Memorials_ very justly argues that at that time most men had no need of a surname. If a man were poor he would never have to sign any document at all during the whole of his life. If he were a servant or a craftsman, a Christian name would be quite enough for him; as, at the present day, we may have servants in the house without knowing their surnames at all; and among the better sort a Christian name with something to distinguish the holder from others with the same Christian name would be quite enough.

By the fourteenth century the old names of the ancient City families have quite died out. These were Algar, Hacon, Thovy, Lotering, Bukerel, Aswy, Basing, Anketill, Blount, Batte, Frowyk, Hervy, Vyel, Harvell, Aleyne, Hardel, and others. Some of these families became extinct; some withdrew into the country; some, perhaps, lost their wealth and sank down into the mass of the people.

As an illustration of these divisions, let us take a string of names consecutively from the Index to the _Calendar of Wills_, part i. (1288-1358):—

Fulbert
Fulham
Fulke
Fuller
Fulsham
Funder
Furbur
Furmager
Furnell
Furnyval
Fusedame
Fustor
Fynch
Fyneham
Fynchyngfeld
Fyngrie

Gaitone
Galeys
Galocher
Gamelyn
Ganter
Garchorp
Garderobe
Gardiner
Garlaun
Garlecmonger
Garscherche
Garthorp
Garton
Gatesdene
Gaugeour
Gaunt
Gaunter
Gautroun
Gedlestone
Geffrei
Gene
Gentil
Gentilman

Of these names—thirty-nine in all—fourteen belong to trades, fifteen belong to places, three express a qualification or condition, three are Christian names, the name Gamelyn suggests Chaucer’s Cook’s Tale of Gamelyn. In another place this occurs as a Christian name. Furnival reminds us that as early as the reign of Henry IV. the Inn once belonged to the Lords Furnival and their town house had become an Inn of Chancery. The name of Fynch appears from Riley’s _Memorials_, p. 229, to have belonged to Winchelsea; the Galocher was a maker of galoches, which were shoes with wooden soles; the name of Gene may have referred to Genoa; Fusedame and Gautroun are beyond me. (See also Appendix IX.)

APPENDICES

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.

Mediæval London, Volume 1: Historical & SocialChapter XIV: Christian Names and Surnames

0%4 min left in chapter